San Diego Law Review
This Casenote examines the California Supreme Court's decision in Graham v. DaimlerChrysler concluding that the adoption of a stricter definition of "public interest" litigation and a comparative catalyst rule will serve to stem the flood of unproductive lawsuits in the high court's ill-conceived decision will otherwise unleash.
The Comparative Catalyst: Reforming Graham v. DaimlerChrysler,
San Diego L. Rev.
Available at: https://digital.sandiego.edu/sdlr/vol42/iss4/6