Home > School of Law > Law School Journals > ILJ > Vol. 26 > Iss. 1 (2025)
San Diego International Law Journal
Document Type
Comment
Abstract
Following the ban on considering race in higher education admissions under Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College, concerns have emerged over maintaining racial diversity in college classrooms. This analysis offers a comparative perspective, exploring the history and methodologies of affirmative action in the United States and India to identify effective strategies for promoting diversity in U.S. universities. Recommended approaches include top percent programs, socioeconomic-based affirmative action, test-optional or test-blind policies, race-based recruiting, removing legacy preferences, and holistic student reviews. By implementing these strategies, universities can still work toward their diversity goals despite the constraints imposed by the 2023 decision.
Recommended Citation
Tyler Dunne,
Preserving Diversity in the Wake of Students for Fair Admissions, Inc.: Historical Lessons from the United States and India,
26
San Diego Int'l L.J.
113
(2025)
Available at:
https://digital.sandiego.edu/ilj/vol26/iss1/4