The Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues
Abstract
In this essay, I will argue that neither of these two presentations of Hayek represent the real Hayek. In Part II of this essay, I criticize Koppelman’s contention that there is little distance, if any, between Hayek’s stance on distributive justice and Rawls’s difference principle. In Part III of this essay, I dispute Koppelman’s claim that Hayek is quite receptive to the development and expansion of the regulatory-administrative state. Each of these stances is rejected by Hayek for the same sorts of reasons that stand behind his rejection of central economic planning. Hayek’s critique of central economic planning, his rejection of doctrines of distributive justice, and his concern about the growth of the interventionist-administrative state are each a part of a single, coherent, doctrinal package.
Volume
26
Issue
2
Start Page
391
Faculty Editor
Steven Smith & Maimon Schwarzschild
Recommended Citation
Mack, Eric
(2025)
"Will the Real F.A. Hayek Please Stand Up!,"
The Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues: Vol. 26:
Iss.
2, Article 3.
Available at:
https://digital.sandiego.edu/jcli/vol26/iss2/3
