•  
  •  
 

San Diego Law Review

Library of Congress Authority File

http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79122466

Document Type

Comments

Abstract

This Comment discusses Ault v. International Harvester Co, arguing that it represents an assault upon the exclusionary rule against subsequent remedial conduct. The Author closely examines Justice Mosk's rationale of admissibility and reviews the traditional exclusionary rule against subsequent remedial conduct.

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS