San Diego Law Review
Document Type
Article
Abstract
This Article critiques the Supreme Court's decision in Nix v. Whiteside. The author argues that, in its analysis, the majority failed to adequately consider the applicable state laws governing a lawyer's professional responsibilities, and instead sought to impose a broader vision of professional standards for the legal profession.
Recommended Citation
Carl A. Auerbach,
What Are Law Clerks for?-Comments on Nix v. Whiteside,
23
San Diego L. Rev.
979
(1986).
Available at:
https://digital.sandiego.edu/sdlr/vol23/iss5/3