San Diego Law Review
Document Type
Comment
Abstract
This Comment explores the conflict between two federal laws when prisoners challenging their confinement seek damages or declaratory relief. On one hand, the exhaustion doctrine requires state prisoners to exhaust their state remedies before filing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal court when they contest their confinement. On the other hand, prisoners challenging their civil rights may file in federal court without exhausting all state remedies. This Comment addresses how federal courts should determine which rule to apply when a prisoner brings an action contesting confinement, but seeks only declaratory relief or damages. The author proposes a resolution by the use of a two-pronged test that first focuses on what the prisoner is challenging, then, in some cases, upon the remedy the prisoner is seeking.
Recommended Citation
Linda M. Bell,
The Exhaustion Doctrine: State Prisoners Caught between Civil Rights Actions and Writs of Habeas Corpus,
29
San Diego L. Rev.
497
(1992).
Available at:
https://digital.sandiego.edu/sdlr/vol29/iss3/4