San Diego Law Review
Document Type
Article
Abstract
The word property had many meanings in 1789, as it does today, and a critical aspect of the ongoing debate about the meaning of the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause has centered on how the word should be read in the context of the Clause. Property has been read by Professor Thomas Merrill to refer to "ownership" interests, by Richard Epstein in terms of a broad Blackstonian conception of the individual control of the possession, use, and disposition of resources, by Benjamin Barros as reflective of constructions through individual expectations and state law, and by me as physical control of material possessions.
Recommended Citation
William M. Treanor,
Take-ings,
45
San Diego L. Rev.
633
(2008).
Available at:
https://digital.sandiego.edu/sdlr/vol45/iss3/3