San Diego Law Review
Document Type
Article
Abstract
In this Article, I will consider two aspects of the controversy that help explain why it is static. I will consider the significance of empirical evidence that lawyers and clients find the rules morally troubling. Zacharias plausibly assumes that such evidence carries compelling weight. I will also look at the nature of morality itself and the extent to which professional rules should be expected to conform to morality.
Recommended Citation
Thomas Morawetz,
Confidentiality and Common Sense: Insights from Philosophy,
48
San Diego L. Rev.
357
(2011).
Available at:
https://digital.sandiego.edu/sdlr/vol48/iss1/32