Antitrust-Doctrine of In Pari Delicto Held Not to be Recognized as a Defense in Private Antitrust Action to Bar Recovery by a Plaintiff Who Was a Party to an Agreement Allegedly Containing Terms in Violation of Antitrust Laws. Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp. (U.S. 1968)

Authors

Peter K. Nunez

Library of Congress Authority File

http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79122466

Document Type

Recent Cases

Abstract

This recent case discusses Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp. (U.S. 1968).

Recommended Citation

Peter K. Nunez, Antitrust-Doctrine of In Pari Delicto Held Not to be Recognized as a Defense in Private Antitrust Action to Bar Recovery by a Plaintiff Who Was a Party to an Agreement Allegedly Containing Terms in Violation of Antitrust Laws. Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp. (U.S. 1968), 6 San Diego L. Rev. 117 (1969).
Available at: https://digital.sandiego.edu/sdlr/vol6/iss1/9