Date of Award
Spring 5-11-2026
Document Type
Undergraduate Honors Thesis
Degree Name
Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy
Department
Philosophy
Advisor
Gary Jones
Abstract
Is health deserved? Is your health owed to you? What does this mean, and whose responsibility is it? I argue that American culture’s use of personal autonomy, “framing”, and ethical intimidation has stunted the improvement of both political and legal structures. This is evident in the politicization of the ‘for-profit’ healthcare system in the United States. American policymakers frequently weaponize moral foundations in order to coerce voters into supporting or opposing certain healthcare policies derived from the principle that some people are more "deserving" of health than others. This calculated “framing” of health concepts has deeply politicized such an ethical topic, hindered real change, and maximized corporate revenue. The US healthcare structure systematically rewards the exploitation of patients and penalizes citizens who struggle to afford escalating healthcare expenses. In contrast, Japan’s healthcare model is rooted in shared social responsibility and resident-based insurance policies. This provides an alternative system where universal healthcare can be achieved effectively, while preserving the use of private insurers.
Digital USD Citation
Azucenas, Ava C., "Is Health Deserved? Personal Autonomy, Framing, Ethical Intimidation, and the Politicization of Healthcare in the United States v. Japan" (2026). Undergraduate Honors Theses. 151.
https://digital.sandiego.edu/honors_theses/151
Copyright
Copyright held by the author
Included in
Applied Ethics Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, Law and Philosophy Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons, Legal Theory Commons