Serious Tort Reform Isn't: A Critique of Professor Sugarman's "Serious Tort Law Reform"

Authors

Harry M. Snyder

Library of Congress Authority File

http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79122466

Document Type

Article

Abstract

In another critique of Prof. Sugarman's proposal, the author argues that Prof. Sugarman's proposals do little to practically solve the current problems of victim compensation, and in fact leave many victims uncompensated and does not provide incentives for safe behavior. The author further argues that Prof. Sugarman's proposals lack the requisite impartiality to objectively effect serious tort reform.

Recommended Citation

Harry M. Snyder, Serious Tort Reform Isn't: A Critique of Professor Sugarman's "Serious Tort Law Reform", 24 San Diego L. Rev. 893 (1987).
Available at: https://digital.sandiego.edu/sdlr/vol24/iss4/6