Document Type
Response or Comment
Publication Date
4-1-2000
Journal Title
Physical Review E
Volume Number
61
Issue Number
4
First Page
4662
Last Page
4665
DOI
10.1103/PhysRevE.61.4662
Version
Publisher PDF: the final published version of the article, with professional formatting and typesetting
Disciplines
Physics
Abstract
A reply is made to Duncan’s Comment [T. L. Duncan, Phys. Rev. E 61, 4661 (2000)] on my earlier paper [D. P. Sheehan, Phys. Rev. E 57, 6660 (1998)] in which he raises an apparent second-law paradox arising from dynamically maintained, steady-state pressure gradients. Resolutions to this paradox are considered in light of current theoretical and experimental understanding.
Digital USD Citation
Sheehan, D. P., "Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Dynamically maintained steady-state pressure gradients’ ’’" (2000). Physics and Biophysics: Faculty Scholarship. 16.
https://digital.sandiego.edu/phys-faculty/16
