Document Type
Article
Publication Date
Winter 2016
Journal Title
Journal of Genius and Eminence
Volume Number
1
Issue Number
1
First Page
61
Last Page
71
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.18536/jge.2016.01.1.1.07
Version
Post-print: the version of the article having undergone peer review but prior to being published
Keywords
creativity, inspiration
Disciplines
Leadership Studies
Abstract
Creativity is valued as an essential human ability. For much of recorded history, the ability to produce creative outcomes has been seen as a gift bestowed rather than as a capacity commonly existing in humans. In more recent times, however, research has suggested that there are a number of personal attributes commonly present in individuals who have established a reputation for being creative in their respective fields. Findings from a recent research study support this assertion. The eight participants in this study were high-achieving and highly creative individuals who had received the prestigious MacArthur Foundation award for creativity. They work in a range of fields including physics, agriculture, computer technology, human rights, conservation, pharmaceuticals, environmental policy, and music. Each is a founder of either a for-profit or nonprofit organization. Findings suggested that the study participants rely on specific habits and practices in their pursuit of creative outcomes. Particularly important are (a) the ability to take a big picture view of a situation, (b) the tendency to combine disparate ideas, and (c) the capacity to live with ambiguity during the creative process.
Digital USD Citation
Hennessy, Leslie, "High-Level Creativity for Nonprofit and For-Profit Organizations: Inspiration or Perspiration" (2016). School of Leadership and Education Sciences: Faculty Scholarship. 33.
https://digital.sandiego.edu/soles-faculty/33
Notes
Original citation: Hennessy, L. A. (2015). High-level creativity for nonprofit and for-profit organizations: Inspiration or perspiration. Journal of Genius and Eminence, 1(1), 61-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.18536/jge.2016.01.1.1.07